For any city, infrastructure
development is a key for its economic growth. Chennai is no exception
to this trend. The southern metro, though one of the fastest
developing cities in the country, still to have basic infrastructure
in place. Bad roads, poor drainage system, dark streets, inadequate
pavements, dismal drinking water supply and the list can go on and
on. What needs to be done to make the city a truly world-class for
denizens?
K RAMANATHAN spoke to
AJIT KUMAR CHORDIA, the newly appointed
President of CREDAI-Chennai and Managing Director of Khivraj Tech
Park,
N NANDAKUMAR, President of CREDAI-Tamil Nadu and MD of
Devinarayan Housing & Property and
NIRANJAN SHARMA, Senior
Vice-President of Sathyasai Foundation, to know about their views on
the impending issue.
- Can you tell us any two best and worst infrastructure
developments happening or happened in Chennai and how it had
impacted or its possible impact in future?
AJIT
KUMAR CHORDIA:
The construction of 100 feet road of OMR has both good and bad. Good
in the sense that IT companies have proliferated and also huge
residential development followed. However, it was badly executed, as
the service roads were and even today have not completed. Peak hour
traffic movement is slow, the proposed construction of flyovers is
long overdue and public transport is poor. The development on the
Bangalore Highway also suffers similar lag, as roads are not
completed and development overtakes infrastructure.
Next good thing to watch in Chennai
will be the Outer Ring Road. I see huge development on this stretch.
This road is expected to be 200 ft and if completed in full unlike in
bits in pieces like OMR, it will spur huge activity.
N NANDAKUMAR: One of the
remarkable infrastructure developments worth mentioning is the
creation of the Chennai Trade Centre, which is seeing round-the-year
patronage. The parking and overall infrastructure is currently
reflecting signs of adequacy and has not impacted the passage of
routine traffic unless otherwise hampered by VVIP movements. Yet
another development is the retention of the green space in the heart
of mount road (Horticultural Park), which does bring about a
commensurate balancing of the eco system in the otherwise concrete
jungle.
In the case of infrastructure
projects, which have not brought about significant value addition,
and worth mentioning here are the flyovers constructed in Alwarpet
and in Adyar leading to Latice Bridge Road, wherein these creations
have only complicated the movement of vehicular traffic resulting in
unprecedented choking.
NIRANJAN SHARMA: Infrastructure
in Chennai in general is awful and needs better planning from
qualified architects. I feel Kodambakkam over bridge on famous Arcot
Road, which connects arterial Anna Salai and Nungambakkam to Western
Chennai’s key areas, was a bad planning. The bridge and the entire
Arcot Road, which extends up to Porur Junction, need to be widened.
But, due to encroachments and other administrative wrangles, people
suffer and so the surrounding areas. They should have provided
adequate space for future planning on both sides while constructing
the bridge some forty years ago. Another bottleneck is Numgambakkam
subway, which too suffers, as there is no provision for future
expansion. The planning is done whenever there is any crisis and not
anticipating one in future. Chandigarh model should be adopted.
Underground drainage, water and power distribution and connecting
roads all need a complete re-planning.
On positive side, the proposed over
bridge from Central Railway Station to Aminchakarai junction would
reduce the traffic on the arterial Ponnamalle High Road. But this
project is still to get approved. Simiularly, the proposed monorail
project too will improve the transportation networks significantly in
certain unexplored areas.
The ongoing metro rail project is
running behind the schedule. This project should have been conceived
a decade back and now, even it becomes operational in 2015, it won’t
serve the purpose fully, as demand would be much more than what is
being offered.
- According to you where we lag behind in providing the best
infrastructure to homebuyers?
AJIT KUMAR CHORDIA: Water and
sewerage supply, and public transport. In addition to roads we need
this to go hand-in-hand. When the government collects huge
infrastructure and amenities charges for the homeowners, it must
provide this also. Buying water through tankers is very expensive and
unsustainable.
N NANDAKUMAR: Currently the
city is developing laterally in different directions. Unfortunately
developments are being done even before basic infrastructure and
social infrastructure are available. The creation of basic
infrastructure and social infrastructure is primarily vested with the
Government and unless the Government maintains pace in creation of
the above, the development activities undertaken by private
developers may not result in holistic habitation.
NIRANJAN SHARMA: I have been in
Chennai for more than two decades. There is a basic fault in urban
planning here. People don’t learn from mistakes. There have been
many instances of flooding due to improper drainage system. Till now,
the situation is same, though efforts are on to construct separate
drains to take away excess rainwater. However, due to poor planning
in some places, people divert sewage into these drains. So, we must
plan for future. Here authorities plan it ‘as-and-when-required’
basis. Officials should go to other states and countries and study
the sewage disposal model there. Nowhere I have seen the sewage lines
go through the center of the road. This is bad planning. The
government should take initiative to improve the living condition of
people by providing good roads, better sanitary condition,
uninterrupted water and power supply, efficient sewage and garbage
disposal system etc. Importantly, new areas should be developed after
providing a complete living condition there.
- Why even within city people suffer due to lack of basic
infrastructure?
AJIT KUMAR CHORDIA: Within city
while drainage connection and water supply is reasonable, here it is
only the quantity of water supplied is the problem. City planning
should go hand- in-hand with the growth of population density.
N NANDAKUMAR: The existing
infrastructure in Chennai city is significantly aged and though
modernisation and upgradation is apace, the rate of growth with
influx of urban population versus the progress of infrastructure are
disproportionate. As a result, there are perpetual constraints for
people within the city.
NIRANJAN SHARMA: As I told
earlier, planning is the key. We have failed to develop the city
fully but are developing outskirts. Within the city, the roads are in
awful state in many areas. More so, the height of the road is getting
increased notwithstanding the fact that the adjacent houses are
getting dwarfed and are vulnerable for inundation during rainy season
in the absence of proper drainage system. Milling system has not been
followed to re-lay old roads. Residents complain of inadequate water
and power supply. We have been making multi-storey buildings but sans
basic infrastructure.
Several residents in Mugappair,
Annanagar, Maduravoil, Amabattur, Porur, and even posh areas in
Virugabakkam, Valasaravakkam, etc complain of frequent disruption in
power and water supply. Roads in many areas are in pathetic
condition. So, it is the duty of the administration to take a good
care of the infrastructure. They should first improve the basic
infrastructure within city and then concentrate on outskirts, as
infrastructure is important for economic development.
- What best can be done to make the facilities in Chennai a
world-class?
AJIT KUMAR CHORDIA: Adopting
green initiatives like encouraging recycling of waste water, smaller
desalination plants for fresh water, extending MRT or mono rail to
peripheral regions will result in making Chennai a world class city.
We must look at Singapore for inspiration.
N NANDAKUMAR: A drastic review
on the maximisation of land utilisation in allowing hi-density
developments bringing regimented classification of developments and
delineating commercial zones will enhance the asset quality in
addition to propelling the capability of the urban habitat. With
enhanced patronage of the public transport system, which can happen
with practicable and qualitative public transport system in place,
Chennai can become comparable with world-class metros.
NIRANJAN SHARMA: Apart from
improving basic infrastructure, the city needs better transport
system. Though we are developing metro rail, it should have been here
a decade back. Our planning does not match with the population growth
and its need. Secondly, we have to learn from certain developed
cities like Chandigarh, Pune etc. For example, Chandigarh was planned
in 1950s keeping in mind the growth of the city in next 100 years.
Apart from dependable transport system, we need to concentrate on
other basics such as safety and security of residents, advanced
lighting system, green initiatives to conserve resources and better
sanitary environs to make Chennai comparable to certain advanced
overseas cities.