NEW DELHI: A
consensus on the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill 2011
was achieved on Thursday at an all-party meeting which enhances compensation
for farmers.
The government accepted key demands of the BJP
regarding leasing of land and compensation reaching the original farmer-owners,
and that of the left regarding rights of tenants.
The Government has also agreed that individual States can pass
legislation regarding leasing of land and limits of acquisition.
Back home, thousands of farmers and land owners across
Sriperumbudur near Chennai are the happier lot as they expect the statement government
amend the law in favour of landowners after passing of the Bill by the Union
Cabinet in the coming Parliament session.
They are looking for relief from the Bill as the SIPCOT
notification to acquire land for industry and Greenfield airport has put them
in tight spot not able to develop or sell their land for more than ten years now.
The BJP wanted 50 per cent compensation to the
original farmers whose land has been purchased after the introduction of the
Bill in Lok Sabha in September of 2011. Raising the issue in the meeting of
parties, Ms. Swaraj said the “land mafia” was on a land-purchase spree in many
parts of the country after the introduction of the Bill, anticipating that the
measure will be passed soon and they can reap the benefits.
If that happens, the farmers who have sold land at a lesser price
will not benefit from the Land Acquisition Act, she said and asked the
government to have a provision specifying that there will be sharing of half
the benefits with the original farmers. The meeting also agreed to CPI(M)’s
demand that a provision of the Bill that gives powers to the government to
amend the schedule should not be misused to dilute the compensation,
rehabilitation and resettlement package.
The government countered criticism that the bill's
provisions make land acquisition more time consuming while pushing up costs,
but all major political parties seemed to have shelved their reservations in
view of the "pro-farmer" orientation given to the proposed law.
Parliamentary minister Kamal Nath made no bones of
the government's intent, telling the meeting that opposing the bill will amount
to being "anti-farmer" and said the bill will be brought to
Parliament for passage soon after both Houses reconvene on Monday.
No comments:
Post a Comment